Home > Sportswear > Athletic Shorts Womens

Athletic Shorts Womens

Athletic Shorts Womens
A question for the ladies only please. What is it about a man’s legs that so many women abhor?

This is a follow up question from one I read previously wondering when short shorts would come back for men. The remarks from the women were very peculiar sometimes outright harsh and I’m just wondering why. Back in the 70’s and early 80’s it was no big deal for men to wear shorts with 3 and 4 inch inseams, and athletic shorts could be even shorter. Now it’s hard to find shorts for men with the hem above the knees or 9 inch inseam. For men legs, the thighs in particular, usually are not a problem area as they are with women. Men doff their shirts all the time and our problem area is our mid-section. I’ve seen many pot-bellied men shirtless with not much if any fanfare. Shorts and swimwear for men just seem to get longer and longer, baggier and baggier and it seems mostly to women’s insistence while on the flip side theirs get shorter, tighter and skimpier. Just want to hear the womens view points on this.
I possibly overexplained a bit. I’m not really concerned or against anything about women’s fashions, All I really want to know is why women seem so opposed to men exposing their leg above the knee.

Isn’t it obvious? All the extra material from the shorts that women are wearing these days (which look like something a hooker shouldn’t be caught dead in) are going to make up the length on the mens shorts.

I don’t have anything against mens legs. The only thing that creeps me out is if their legs are really, REALLY white or if they’re nearly hairless (and I don’t mean cyclists/swimmers who wax or shave them, I mean old guys with poor circulation and the hair won’t grow. Otherwise, I don’t have anything against mens legs as a rule.

Athletic Shorts Womens

Athletic Shorts Womens

, , , ,